online edition

The Student Newspaper of Hopkins School

    • "I don't know, but it's very European," said @roma.aminn.

What's in a "Scarf"? Modern Cultural Appropriation

Anya Mahajan '25
This summer, the “Scandinavian scarf” took TikTok by storm. The only thing is, the Scandinavian scarf
isn’t Scandinavian — it’s Indian.
This summer, the “Scandinavian scarf” took TikTok by storm. The only thing is, the Scandinavian scarf
isn’t Scandinavian — it’s Indian. Coined in the 1980s, cultural appropriation is the co-opting of cultural ideas or
practices, often from a marginalized community, without credit or acknowledgment. Over the years, the term has become increasingly prevalent in conversations about colonialism and ethnocentrism. Acts of cultural appropriation are so woven into the fabric of our society that they can be largely undetectable, and today’s influencer culture exacerbates this process through microtrends and their vitality.

In the context of social media, culturally appropriated trends often follow a similar pattern: An influencer sees someone post clothing, food, or something else unique to their culture, and then commandeers it, in the process renaming as something trendy and buzzword-y to get the algorithm engaged. This video – not the original – gets on For You pages, and media consumers unwittingly popularize it. The trend goes viral, lasting two weeks to a month before being cycled out of the mainstream.

The “Scandinavian scarf” is a perfect example of
appropriation gone viral. One fashion influencer on TikTok posts a white woman in a blouse, a long draping skirt, and a long shawl-like scarf. She then asks, “What are we classifying this wedding guest vibe as, because I’m literally so obsessed with it. Scandinavian wedding guest? I don't know, but it’s very European.” A sari, for those unaware, is a wardrobe staple for Indian women dating back centuries.
It consists of a blouse, a long draping skirt, and a “long shawl-like scarf” — Wikipedia’s definition of a dupatta.

The term “Scandinavian scarf,” i.e. dupatta, goes viral, following the pattern. Now, the originator of the trend
is not solely to blame for her obliviousness; ignorance is a long-lasting trend across any social media platform. But these seemingly simple acts of carelessness give way to a cultural erasure
from the media, and have scarring consequences. And often, it’s the double standards that are the most harmful.

Let’s take another trend that originated from South Asia: hair oiling. There’s a word in Hindi to describe hair oiling, “sneha,” highlighting the practice’s significance to Indian communities. It is but one minute part of the 5,000 year old Ayurvedic science, the Indian key to wellness. Growing up, Sundays were a torment: My mother would have my head between her knees, hands full of coconut oil, vigorously massaging
my head and giving me a headache.

Then, I hated oiling. It had a way of staying in the hair long af-
ter washing, and I was scared of being perceived as “greasy” and “dirty” by my classmates, most of whom lacked knowledge of the practice, thus falling into a racist stereotype that has plagued perceptions of Indians for decades.

The word sneha has another meaning as well: “to love.” Now I see oiling as my mother’s form of affection, giving me the thick and healthy hair I am grateful for today.

Today, I wonder: Would I have felt so ashamed if the hair oiling trend had surfaced 10 years earlier? Would I have felt so alienated if everyone around me had slicked back hair, as they do today? This is why cultural appropriation matters so much, and why I don’t
blame my younger self at all for the self-hatred I felt. Embracing a part of a culture only when it’s conve-
nient for you and not acknowledging its history is a form of modern colonialism — in fact, exactly what
happened to the indigenous people after the arrival of the Europeans. There is only one solution to
this exploitation: cultural appreciation. The original creator of the “Scandinavian Scarf” trend could
have shown genuine curiosity about the origins of the clothing; when you have a platform with 300K
followers, I think you can spare a little time to do your research.

By appreciating rather than appropriating, we honor cultures in their full richness, history, and meaning. In the end, we, as participants in social media,
have a duty, too. We should support uplifting creators who can educate us about culture in its many forms.
When context is missing, run, don’t walk, to Google.
Back
Editor in Chief 
Asher Joseph

Managing Editor 
Margaret Russell

News
Claire Billings
Jo Reymond
Rose Porosoff
Features
Eric Roberts
Abby Rakotomavo
Elona Spiewak
Veena Scholand
 
Arts
Miriam Levin
Liliana Dumas
Saisha Ghai
Olivia Yu
Op/Ed
Anya Mahajan
Rain Zeng
Winter Szarabajka
Aerin O'Brien

Sports
Karun Srihari
Samantha Bernstein
Hana Beauregard
Micah Betts
Elaina Paktuka
Editors-at-Large
Edel Lee
Anjali van Bladel
Nate Gerber
Rebecca Li

Cartoonists
Hailey Willey
Web Editors
Amelia Hudonogov-Foster
Anvi Pathak
Chloe Wang

Faculty Advisers
Stephen May
Elizabeth Gleason
Shanti Madison
The Razor's Edge reflects the opinion of 4/5 of the editorial board and will not be signed. The Razor welcomes letters to the editor but reserves the right to decide which letters to publish, and to edit letters for space reasons. Unsigned letters will not be published, but names may be withheld on request. Letters are subject to the same libel laws as articles. The views expressed in letters are not necessarily those of the editorial board.
     
The Razor,
 an open forum publication, is published monthly during the school year by students of: 
Hopkins School
986 Forest Road
New Haven, CT 06515

Phone: 203.397.1001 x628
Email: smay@hopkins.edu